0.00/0.04	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.42	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.15/0.42	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.42	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.42	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.15/0.42	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.15/0.42	% CPULimit : 1440
0.15/0.42	% WCLimit  : 180
0.15/0.42	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:03:53 UTC 2026
0.15/0.42	% CPUTime  : 
0.15/0.42	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.22/0.49	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.22/0.51	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OjaaU4Mcc2/E---3.1_2852490.p
2.77/0.91	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
2.77/0.91	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
2.77/0.91	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% post_as_ho10 with pid 2852506 completed with status 0
2.77/0.91	% Result found by post_as_ho10
2.77/0.91	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
2.77/0.91	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
2.77/0.91	% No SInE strategy applied
2.77/0.91	% Search class: HGUNF-FFMF22-SHHFFMBN
2.77/0.91	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
2.77/0.91	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2852511 completed with status 10
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho10 with 19s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% post_as_ho10 with pid 2852517 completed with status 10
2.77/0.91	% Starting sh2lt with 17s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% sh2lt with pid 2852519 completed with status 0
2.77/0.91	% Result found by sh2lt
2.77/0.91	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
2.77/0.91	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
2.77/0.91	% No SInE strategy applied
2.77/0.91	% Search class: HGUNF-FFMF22-SHHFFMBN
2.77/0.91	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
2.77/0.91	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2852511 completed with status 10
2.77/0.91	% Starting post_as_ho10 with 19s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% post_as_ho10 with pid 2852517 completed with status 10
2.77/0.91	% Starting sh2lt with 17s (1) cores
2.77/0.91	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
2.77/0.91	% Presaturation interreduction done
2.77/0.91	
2.77/0.91	% Proof found!
2.77/0.91	% SZS status Theorem
2.77/0.91	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
2.77/0.91	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.77/0.91	thf(decl_24, type, epred2_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.77/0.91	thf(decl_25, type, epred3_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.77/0.91	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i).
2.77/0.91	thf(decl_27, type, epred4_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.77/0.91	thf(decl_28, type, esk2_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i).
2.77/0.91	thf(cTHM120C_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:(((![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)))&![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)|(X2 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6))))=>![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)))))&![X3:$i > $o, X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6)|(X2 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6))))&~(![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[X7:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X8:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[X9:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X10:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OjaaU4Mcc2/E---3.1_2852490.p', cTHM120C_pme)).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:(((![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)))&![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)|(X2 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6))))=>![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)))))&![X3:$i > $o, X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6)|(X2 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6))))&~(![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[X7:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X8:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[X9:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X10:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120C_pme])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:(((![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)))&![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)|(X2 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6))))=>![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)))))&![X3:$i > $o, X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6)|(X2 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6))))&~(![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X22:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X23:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X27:$i, X28:$i, X32:$i]:(((((~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27)|(X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27)|(X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32))))&((~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28)|(X23 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28)|(X23 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))))&(((~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32))))&((~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X6)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X6)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|~((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X6:$i, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|~((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (esk1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X6:$i, X7:$i]:((((epred3_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0))))=(epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))))|((^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0:$i]:(($true))))|(X1 @ (epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ (epred3_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_7])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (((^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0:$i]:(($true))))|((epred2_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0))))!=(epred1_2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X6:$i, X7:$i]:((((epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0))))=(epred1_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))))|((^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0:$i]:(($true))))|(X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ (epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_11])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0:$i]:(($true)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
2.77/0.91	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]), ['proof']).
2.77/0.91	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
2.77/0.91	% Parsed axioms                        : 1
2.77/0.91	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
2.77/0.91	% Initial clauses                      : 8
2.77/0.91	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
2.77/0.91	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
2.77/0.91	% Processed clauses                    : 492
2.77/0.91	% ...of these trivial                  : 13
2.77/0.91	% ...subsumed                          : 114
2.77/0.91	% ...remaining for further processing  : 365
2.77/0.91	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 82
2.77/0.91	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
2.77/0.91	% Backward-subsumed                    : 89
2.77/0.91	% Backward-rewritten                   : 172
2.77/0.91	% Generated clauses                    : 2662
2.77/0.91	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2185
2.77/0.91	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
2.77/0.91	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
2.77/0.91	% Paramodulations                      : 2137
2.77/0.91	% Factorizations                       : 2
2.77/0.91	% NegExts                              : 61
2.77/0.91	% Equation resolutions                 : 82
2.77/0.91	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
2.77/0.91	% Total rewrite steps                  : 334
2.77/0.91	% ...of those cached                   : 313
2.77/0.91	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional check models        : 0
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
2.77/0.91	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
2.77/0.91	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
2.77/0.91	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
2.77/0.91	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
2.77/0.91	% Current number of processed clauses  : 51
2.77/0.91	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
2.77/0.91	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
2.77/0.91	%    Negative unit clauses             : 8
2.77/0.91	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 27
2.77/0.91	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1501
2.77/0.91	% ...number of literals in the above   : 6741
2.77/0.91	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
2.77/0.91	% Current number of archived clauses   : 314
2.77/0.91	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5252
2.77/0.91	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2555
2.77/0.91	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 146
2.77/0.91	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1050
2.77/0.91	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
2.77/0.91	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 1693
2.77/0.91	% BW rewrite match successes           : 368
2.77/0.91	% Condensation attempts                : 0
2.77/0.91	% Condensation successes               : 0
2.77/0.91	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 677521
2.77/0.91	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 269
2.77/0.91	
2.77/0.91	% -------------------------------------------------
2.77/0.91	% User time                : 0.359 s
2.77/0.91	% System time              : 0.012 s
2.77/0.91	% Total time               : 0.371 s
2.77/0.91	% Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
2.77/0.91	
2.77/0.91	% -------------------------------------------------
2.77/0.91	% User time                : 0.360 s
2.77/0.91	% System time              : 0.017 s
2.77/0.91	% Total time               : 0.377 s
2.77/0.91	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
2.77/0.91	% E exiting
2.77/0.92	EOF